13 Apr

Buying a home? CMHC could soon kick in 10% of the cost — for a price


Posted by: Frederic Pichette

The government is earmarking $1.25B over 3 years for something it’s calling a ‘shared equity mortgage’

The 2019 federal budget includes a tantalizing pitch for prospective first-time homebuyers — one that could see Canada’s housing agency contribute up to 10 per cent of the purchase price of a home and bring down the mortgage load for borrowers.

The budget offers the program, known as the First Time Home Buyer Incentive, as a way to help with housing affordability. The government is earmarking $1.25 billion over three years for something its “shared equity mortgage.”

Functionally, it’s more like an almost interest-free loan — one where the repayment plan doesn’t require any payback until years in the future. In order to qualify, an applicant must have a household income of less than $120,000 per year and be able to come up with a five per cent down payment — the minimum requirement for an insured mortgage with the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC).

CMHC is the Crown corporation that backstops the vast majority of Canada’s housing market by insuring the loans that finance it. This new program will make its role in the market even larger than it already is.

In addition to those stipulations, the program caps out at four times the applicant’s annual income, which means it can only help homeowners looking to buy properties where the mortgage value plus the CMHC loan don’t exceed $480,000.

But if a would-be buyer meets the conditions described above, under the program, the CMHC would kick in up to 10 per cent of the value of a newly built home, or five per cent of the value of a resale.

The CMHC would contribute that much to the home purchase in exchange for a corresponding equity stake in the home. That has the effect of bringing down the size of the homeowner’s mortgage — but comes with a bill to be paid down the line.

Precise details of how the program works won’t come out until later in the fall, but today the government provided a rough breakdown of how it might work for a prospective buyer. If a first-time buyer wants to get a home that costs $400,000, they’d have to come up with a $20,000 down payment, under both the new rules and the old ones.

Normally, they’d have to take out a loan for $380,000 to cover the rest of the purchase price — but under the new program (if it’s a newly constructed home), CMHC could kick in $40,000 toward the purchase price, in exchange for a 10 per cent stake in the home.

That brings the buyer’s mortgage down to just $340,000 for the home, instead of $380,000. On a standard mortgage at 3.5 per cent interest, that translates into a monthly mortgage payment more than $200 lower than it would have been for the 25-year life of the loan. That’s more than $2,700 a year in potential savings.

The catch is that the homeowner eventually has to pay back the CMHC’s stake in the property — but not until they sell (or sooner, but only if they want to).

The budget is far from clear on how much the buyer would owe; is it the same dollar amount the CMHC provided up front, or does the bill go up based on how much the house has appreciated in value?

Government officials say details of the plan will be hashed out in the coming months. Craig Alexander, chief economist with accounting consultancy Deloitte, calls the program a “clever idea” and says the benefits should outweigh the downsides.

Economist Craig Alexander says the shared equity mortgage plan has the potential to help with affordability issues. (CBC)

“You want to be mindful that the government doesn’t put in policies that end up bidding up prices,” he said, adding that, on the whole, the plan could help more Canadians start climbing the housing ladder.

The government is estimating the plan could create about 100,000 new first-time buyers over the next three years.

But not everyone agrees there’s nothing but upside. Craig Wright, chief economist with the Royal Bank of Canada, calls the program “a solution looking for a problem.”

He cites research from the most recent government census in 2016: roughly 67.8 per cent of Canadians owned their own homes that year.

That’s higher than ownership rates in other countries — including the U.S., where the rate is 63.4 per cent and falling swiftly. Other world capitals such as Paris (33 per cent home ownership rate), Berlin (37 per cent) and London (47 per cent) stand in stark contrast to Canadian cities like Calgary (73 per cent) and Toronto (66 per cent).

Even rent-happy Montreal has an ownership rate of 55 per cent, which is why Wright said he’s not convinced Canada has a home ownership problem.

Which is why he thinks the program “is more about politics than policy.”

Worse still, he says if it’s done poorly Wright said the program has the potential to undo some of the sensible market cooling measures Ottawa has implemented in recent years: capping loan terms, setting minimum down payment levels and introducing mortgage ‘stress tests’ last year.

“Demand will show up now, while supply will show up later,” he said. “And in the near term prices could move higher so … you may make it less affordable to own a home.”

Economist David MacDonald, with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, also says the plan doesn’t really do much to help people buy a home more affordably.

“Taking out new loans from CMHC or retirement savings doesn’t make housing more affordable,” he said. “It just allows for another source of debt financing that must be repaid.”

By incentivizing new builds over resale homes, the government hopes its new shared equity mortgage plan can help stimulate more construction in Canada’s housing stock. (Ben Nelms/Bloomberg)

The government says program details will be hashed out later but, for buyers, the repayment terms are the real wild card. Exactly how much will they have to repay CMHC? And will that sum be affected by changes in the home’s value?

“If your house goes up 20 per cent, does what you pay them go up?” Wright asks. “On the flip side, what if it goes down — do you have to make them whole?”

Wright says he suspects the CMHC will have a stake both on the upside and the down, but that’s the million-dollar question for home owners that federal officials weren’t answering today.

Other housing measures

On top of the CMHC program, the budget pledges $100 million per year, for five years, to help fund non-profit groups that are already offering this type of shared equity mortgage product.

That could include Toronto-based non-profit developer Options For Homes, which is working on more than 600 units in the Greater Toronto Area on a similar funding model. The company works with would-be buyers to fill the gap in the purchase price by kicking in up to 15 per cent, for a stake in the equity, CEO Heather Tremain said in an interview.

It’s not free money. Any prospective buyer has to get approved for a mortgage just as they normally would, and has to come up with the minimum down payment level that the CMHC requires. And of course, buyers pay back what they owe, plus a corresponding share in any gains, down the line.

But Tremain says shared equity mortgages are a winning formula that can work for all sides without driving up prices or increasing risk.

“It’s a new idea for a lot of people today … but we’ve been doing it for 25 years,” she said, adding that the company has funded 3,000 units over the years and only experiencing five defaults in that time. “Any bank would love that stat,” she said.

The new mortgage money wasn’t the only housing-related announcement in the budget.

The government also is increasing the amount that a first-time buyer can withdraw from an RRSP, without penalty — $35,000, up from the current level of $25,000 where it has been for the last decade. And Ottawa also will amend the RRSP withdrawal rules to help people who have been through family crises.

Starting this year, Canadians who have seen their marriages or common law partnerships break down will be able to participate in the Home Buyer’s Plan, even if they don’t meet the technical requirement of being a first-time buyer.

There’s something in the budget for renters, too.

The government says it will expand a program it launched in 2017 to fund construction of rental units with low-cost loans. Last year, it beefed up the Rental Construction Financing Initiative to add 14,000 more units to the program, and this year’s budget will add nine years of funding to the program.

For an added cost of $10 billion on the existing program, the government says 42,500 new rental units will be added to Canada’s housing stock by 2028.

And the government also is cracking down on what it calls financial crime in the housing sector.

Recent increases to the budgets of tax and other regulatory agencies have uncovered $100 million worth of addition taxes assessed due to increasingly complicated home sales — something that has convinced the government to keep digging for more.

Ottawa will give the Canada Revenue Agency another $50 million over five years to root out tax avoidance in matters such as:

  • Reporting the sale of a primary residence.
  • Ensuring proper taxes are paid on the sale of a second property.
  • Reporting gains from real estate “flipping.”
  • Reporting commissions on home sales as taxable income.
  • Builders charging and remitting GST or HST on new home sales.

The government says those crackdowns are expected to pay for themselves and then some, bringing in $68 million worth of revenue over the next half decade.

7 Apr

Montreal real estate: Mont-Tremblant has become a second-home boom town

Latest News

Posted by: Frederic Pichette

“It’s hotter than it’s been since pre-2008,” says a senior director at Engels & Völkers Tremblant

It’s not just Montreal real estate that’s hot. The roaring demand for property in the city is rippling out to cottage country, too.

After a decade of unremarkable sales in Mont-Tremblant, for example, today the resort town is buzzing with buyers — and a surge in construction to meet the demand.

According to Steven Lafave, senior director at Engels & Völkers Tremblant, the market there is booming. Sales are increasing and the supply of homes for sale is shrinking, pushing prices up. The area is seeing more new development than it has in a decade, with a panoply of projects in the pipeline to come on the market within the next 12 to 18 months, he said.

“It’s hotter than it’s been since pre-2008. In the last 10 to 12 years we’ve not seen a market like we’re seeing today,” Lafave said. “A lot of people think the buyers here are primarily international. It’s a market we’re very interested in, certainly, but the primary market is still Montreal and Ottawa. A lot are existing homeowners.”

The south side of the mountain was the first to be intensively developed, he said, but after three decades, most of the buildable land has been exploited. Most new construction is now happening at Versant Soleil, near Loto-Québec’s Mont Tremblant Casino.

One of the latest big projects to be announced is a five-storey, four-star condo-hotel project next to the casino, including 92 ski-in, ski-out condos with hotel management and amenities. The $45-million project by C Hôtels Tremblant will include an outdoor pool, fitness centre and spa, and is priced at $380,000 and up.

The Mont-Tremblant area saw a 23-per-cent increase in the number of transactions in 2018 over 2017, and Lafave said 2019 is trending even higher. The median price for resort properties has increased from $256,500 in 2017 to $390,000 today. Not surprisingly, the overall dollar value of transactions is also up, increasing 31 per cent last year from 2017.

Looking specifically at vacation property listings in Tremblant Village, overall sales increased from 198 transactions in 2017 to 245 last year. There’s been a notable increase in luxury resort property sales over $1 million as well. In 2018, there were 26 vacation property sales over $1 million within the village, compared with just 10 the year before.

While sales are up, the supply of homes for sale is shrinking. The market is becoming especially tight close to the base of the mountain and within the resort area, Lafave said. In January there were 212 such listings on the market, compared with 265 the year before. In January 2015, there were 409 resort property listings in the village.

There are a few factors behind this surge in activity, Lafave said. The resort town has matured into a thriving community. New schools, supermarkets, clinics and other services for residents have made it more appealing for people to live there full time, and have also brought more jobs to the area.

Increasingly, Montrealers are able to keep their big-city jobs while enjoying the resort life. The drive into Montreal is about an hour and a half to two hours, depending on where exactly you’re going and how bad the traffic is. While there are full-time residents who are willing to spend three or four hours a day commuting, thanks to technology many part-time or full-time residents in the Mont-Tremblant area can now bring their work with them.

For Montrealers who earn their bread tapping at keyboards and fielding phone calls, it’s easy enough to pack cellphones and laptops as well as skis and work from the cottage or cabin on Friday and Monday to make the most of weekends on the mountain. Others reverse the pattern, spending a couple of days a week at a pied-à-terre in the city, while spending most of their time in the mountains.

“We’re seeing that as the markets heat up in the city it gives people an opportunity to cash out on their primary residence and invest more in their secondary homes,” Lafave said.  “A lot of what’s happening here is fuelled by the action and activity in Montreal.”